The 5 Biggest Cover-Ups in Christian History

For nearly two thousand years, Christianity has been shaped not by the voice of Jesus, but by the voice of others—men who came after him, redefined his teachings, and constructed a new theology in his name. Among them, none looms larger than Paul. Though hailed as an apostle by later generations, Paul was, by his own admission, once a fierce enemy of the very movement he would come to dominate. His radical transformation—from persecutor to self-declared apostle—hinged not on any public ordination or direct appointment by Jesus, but on a private, unverifiable revelation.

But Paul is only the beginning of the problem. The deeper issue is not just theological confusion—it is spiritual colonization. Christians today have inherited a belief system that has been systematically stripped of its mystical roots and esoteric wisdom. They have been conditioned to reject profound concepts that once formed the backbone of divine knowledge: the stars, the soul’s journey, and the eternal cycle of prophetic succession. They were taught that reincarnation is heresy, that the heavens are silent, and that no prophet comes after Jesus—despite clear scriptural evidence to the contrary.

Yet Jesus himself warned us that the truth would disturb before it enlightens. In the Gospel of Thomas, he declared:

"Let him who seeks continue seeking until he finds. When he finds, he will become troubled. When he becomes troubled, he will be astonished, and he will rule over the All." (Gospel of Thomas, Saying 2)

These words are not for the complacent—they are for the sincere seeker, willing to endure discomfort in pursuit of truth.

That discomfort first begins with hard questions: Why does Paul’s message contradict Jesus’ own teachings? Why were Jesus’ true disciples marginalized while Paul was elevated? Why has the doctrine of reincarnation been buried, when even Jesus' contemporaries believed in the return of prophetic souls? And perhaps most urgently—who is the divinely appointed guide of our time, if the prophetic chain is never broken?

This article is for those willing to confront centuries of theological distortion. It is for those who are ready to cast off inherited beliefs and return to the original, uncorrupted truth of God’s messengers. We will expose Paul’s deviations, unveil the esoteric truths that Christianity has forgotten, and re-center the message around the living guidance of God’s appointed representative on Earth today.

1. Paul Wasn’t a Disciple — He Was a Self-Appointed Apostle

Paul is undeniably the most influential figure in modern Christianity. So influential, in fact, that his writings are quoted in churches more so than the words of Jesus himself. Yet this raises a critical and often overlooked question: How did someone who never met Jesus, who never walked with him, who wasn’t present at his crucifixion or resurrection, become the dominant voice of Christianity?

Paul came into the picture not as a disciple, not even as a believer, but as a fierce persecutor of Christians (Acts 8:3). Then, suddenly, he claimed a private, unverifiable divine revelation from Jesus on his way to Damascus (Acts 9:3–6) — and without confirmation from Jesus' appointed apostles, declared himself an apostle (Galatians 1:1). From there, Paul presented a message that deviated drastically from the one Jesus lived and preached.

If we examine the criteria for being a legitimate disciple, as outlined in the Book of Acts, Paul does not fit the qualifications. Simon Peter, the man appointed by Jesus as his successor and the head of the Church, set forth the conditions for someone to fill the twelfth spot left by Judas. They must have been with Jesus from the beginning of his ministry, from his baptism to his crucifixion, and they must have witnessed his resurrection (Acts 1:21-22). Paul, however, fails to meet any of these criteria, and ultimately, Matthias was chosen to fill that position.

Jesus' teachings were centered on humility, compassion, justice, and strict adherence to God’s law. He emphasized monotheism, repeatedly affirming that he was sent by God to speak and act on His behalf:

"For I have not spoken on my own authority, but the Father who sent me has Himself given me commandment—what to say and what to speak." (John 12:49)

Jesus preached a perfect monotheistic message:

"Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one." (Mark 12:29)

Yet, Paul transformed Jesus from a servant of God into God Himself, turning him into an object of worship.

Paul’s writings are dominated by themes of sin, blood atonement, inherited guilt, and judgment - concepts foreign to the Gospel that Jesus preached. His writings carry a tone of defensiveness—he repeatedly insists, "I am not lying” and he often found it necessary to prove himself. Unlike Jesus, who spoke with bold, authoritative confidence - Paul seems constantly preoccupied with defending his legitimacy.

Even more disturbing, Paul openly attacks Jesus’ true disciples. If we read between the lines, we see the enmity and hatred Paul had toward them. He accuses Simon Peter—the one Jesus appointed as the head of the Church—of hypocrisy and leading others astray (Galatians 2:13).

But what did Jesus say about his disciples?

“Whoever does not receive you or listen to your words... it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.” (Matthew 10:14–15)

To reject or undermine the disciples, according to Jesus, invites divine wrath. And yet Paul not only discredits them, he dismisses their standing entirely:

“As for those who seemed to be important—whatever they were, makes no difference to me.” (Galatians 2:6)

If Paul was truly aligned with God’s message, why did he need to constantly justify and defend himself? Why was his message so different from the one Jesus preached? Jesus and his disciples preached with clarity, courage, and conviction. They never had to remind people they weren’t lying. But someone who is repeatedly justifying themselves, is suspicious to say the least.

If anyone fits the label of a hypocrite, it would be Paul himself. In fact, he exposed himself as one. In his own words:

“I have made myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law… so as to win those under the law. To those not having the law I became like one not having the law… so as to win those not having the law… To the weak I became weak, to win the weak.” (1 Corinthians 9:19-22)

This is a man shaping his message to fit the market, yet he calls it divine inspiration. He even said:

“If we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse!” (Galatians 1:8)

Paul elevated himself over the legitimate disciples. This does not sound like a humble servant trying to spread God’s message, it is forced dominance, and arrogance at its finest.

Jesus said he came “not to abolish the law… but to fulfill it” (Matthew 5:17). He never nullified the old testament. And here we have Paul abrogating the law, arguing with Simon Peter, and saying that the Jewish law of circumcision did not apply to the gentiles. Under what authority was he speaking? Paul said that if you profess that Jesus is God, that is enough for salvation, and that by grace one is “saved through faith” (Ephesians 2:8). However, Jesus never claimed that faith alone would save a person, rather, salvation comes through good works and sacrifice.

“Faith without works is dead.” (James 2:26)

"Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." (Matthew 7:21)

As we can see, Jesus’ doctrine is totally different from Paul's.

Jesus was a man who stood against injustice. We see Jesus turning the tables of the moneylenders and exposing the hypocrisy of religious leaders who preached what they didn't practice. Jesus was completely against the government, which is why he was seen as a threat. Yet, here we have Paul speaking favourably of those same authorities, the ones who executed Jesus. He writes:

“Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities... The authorities that exist have been established by God.” (Romans 13:1–2)

This was the same empire that crucified Jesus. How could obedience to them be obedience to God? Whom God appointed, was in fact Simon Peter, who Paul fought against.

The contradictions continue to pile up, and the absurdity grows deeper... Jesus never charged anyone for hearing the truth, and no prophet in history would disgrace themselves by charging for spreading God’s message. Jesus declared, "You received without paying; give without pay" (Matthew 10:8). But Paul, in his self-appointed role, felt no shame in charging money. He declared, "The Lord commanded that those who proclaim the gospel should get their living by the gospel" (1 Corinthians 9:14). Time and again, we see Paul uprooting Jesus' message, introducing new doctrines, fighting against his disciples, and seeking power for himself. Jesus warned of false prophets who would come in his name, and Paul fits this description more than anyone.

2. Jesus Wasn’t God — He Said So Himself

Christians have been led to believe that Jesus is the supreme God—a theological error rooted in Pauline doctrine rather than the teachings of Jesus himself. However, this is not to diminish the status of Jesus, who holds an exceptionally high rank among the prophets. In fact, he is so spiritually elevated that he sends peace upon himself (Qur'an 19:33). Jesus is indeed unique—referred to as the Spirit of God (Ruh Allah) incarnated into flesh—distinguishing him from all other messengers. Yet, this divine connection does not equate to divinity itself. Tragically, many have mistaken his exalted status as proof of godhood, when in fact, as he states in many places in the Bible, he was a servant of God who intended to carry His message. (Aba Al-Sadiq explains the concept of Jesus Christ incarnated as the spirit of God in the following video: Jesus is the ARCHANGEL Gabriel, The Angel Of Revelation).

God rules the earth as He rules in heaven through His divinely chosen messenger. The messenger of the time carries the spirit of God. God’s will is placed within his heart, so his actions and speech are not his, but God’s. However, this should not be mistaken for Godhood itself, for God is too vast and great to be limited to any created being. He is beyond creation so to speak. 

“For I have not spoken on my own authority; but the Father who sent me gave me a command, what I should say and what I should speak.” (Bible, Book of John, Chapter 12, Verse 49)

God's spirit is eternally anchored on earth, but the vessel that carries this spirit changes over time - for the flesh is mortal, and no human body lives forever. This concept is perfectly depicted in Jesus’s saying “I am the light of the world” (John 8:12), but he also clarified this statement by adding, "While I am in the world, I am the light of the world” (John 9:5). In other words, the light—God’s Spirit—resided in him for a time, but was never limited to him alone. Once his earthly mission neared its end, that light was passed on. When Jesus gave Simon Peter the ‘keys to the Kingdom of Heaven’ (Matthew 16:19), it was a transition of the Holy Spirit - now his successor is the one in charge of executing God’s will.

If we were to strip away the writings of the imposter Paul, we would be left with a crystal-clear monotheistic message. The real Jesus never claimed to be God. Over and over, he emphasized his role as a servant—one sent by God to speak on His behalf.

“He who sent me is true; and I speak to the world those things which I heard from Him.” (Bible, Book of John, Chapter 8, Verse 26)

Jesus himself admitted his human limitations “But of that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the son, but only the Father” (Mark 13:32). If Jesus were truly God, wouldn't he know all things, including the past and future? He also openly identified himself as a prophet, “Truly I tell you, no prophet is accepted in his hometown” (Luke 4:24). These are not the words of a deity, but of a humble messenger—one fully submitted to the will of the One who sent him.

The true essence of religion lies not merely in rituals, beliefs, or reading ancient texts, but in obedience to the living messenger of the time. Throughout history, God has never left humanity without a guide, from Adam to Noah, from Moses to Jesus, and beyond. But the devil always found a way to misguide the people by depicting them as the ultimate truth, deities to be worshipped, so to speak. To worship or pray to Jesus is not monotheism. It is, in truth, polytheism. Jesus never asked to be worshipped. He prayed to God, submitted to God, and called others to do the same. To turn the servant into the Master is to fundamentally violate the very message he came to deliver.

"You shall have no other gods before Me." (Bible, Book of Exodus, Chapter 20, Verse 3)

3. Jesus Didn’t Die for Your Sins — That’s a Pauline Fabrication

Christian theology asserts that the crucifixion of Jesus serves as a universal atonement for the sins of those who profess belief in him. According to this view, humanity inherited death through Adam’s original sin, and Jesus’s sacrificial death supposedly reverses that curse. But this claim raises a fundamental contradiction: if Jesus truly nullified original sin and its consequences, then why does death still exist? Moreover, this idea portrays Jesus’s mission as solely a path to death, not life. But was Jesus truly sent only to die? He was sent as a guide, a reformer, and a divinely appointed king—to lead, not to be executed. If his death was the entire purpose of his mission, then didn’t the Romans merely carry out God's plan? Didn't they do us a favour by carrying out his mission? Should we, then, thank them for their supposed contribution to salvation? This logic borders on absurdity and contradicts both morality and scripture.

The notion that Jesus died as a sacrificial atonement was introduced not by Jesus himself, but by Paul. He writes, "Christ loved us and gave himself up for us as a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God" (Ephesians 5:2). But this doctrine stands in stark contradiction to the principle that each person bears responsibility for their own actions. 

The Bible is replete with verses affirming individual accountability:

"Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father." (Matthew 7:21)

"Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor children for their fathers; each is to die for his own sin." (Deuteronomy 24:16)

"The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father... the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself." (Ezekiel 18:20)

"Each will die for their own sin; whoever eats sour grapes—their own teeth will be set on edge." (Jeremiah 31:29–30)

Even Paul contradicts his own doctrine of substitutionary atonement elsewhere:

"God will repay each person according to what they have done." (Romans 2:6)

"Each of us will receive what is due for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad." (2 Corinthians 5:10)

Christians also argue that the near-sacrifice of Isaac foreshadowed God’s sacrifice of Jesus. But this parallel collapses under scrutiny. In the story of Abraham, God explicitly stops the sacrifice, providing a ram instead. It was a test, not a divine endorsement of human sacrifice. Yet, the Christian interpretation claims that God, who abhors human sacrifice, not only allowed but willed the gruesome crucifixion of His own beloved?

This notion is inconsistent with God's law, which explicitly condemns and forbids human sacrifice:

"Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Molek... I am the LORD." (Leviticus 18:21)

"Let no one be found among you who sacrifices their son or daughter..." (Deuteronomy 18:10)

If God despised the pagan practice of child sacrifice, how could He then demand the sacrifice of His own beloved messenger? The logic is not only morally troubling, but theologically incoherent.

Finally, even within the Jewish tradition, sins were symbolically transferred onto a goat—not a human being, and certainly not a messianic figure. If God is able to transfer the sins of humanity onto a goat, what does He need to sacrifice His one and only Messiah for? God, in His mercy, did not require the blood of the Messiah for forgiveness. The notion that God needed a bloody human sacrifice for redemption is not divine justice—it is a man-made fabrication, introduced by inside enemies who wanted to destroy Christianity.

In light of all this, it is time for humanity to re-examine inherited doctrines with sincerity, reason, and spiritual integrity. Following the interpretations of fallible men without question only distances us from the truth. What the world needs is a divinely appointed guide—one who carries the spirit of God and can distinguish between divine revelation and man-made innovation. If we return to the scriptures with an objective and honest heart, free from doctrinal bias, we may discover a very different truth than the one we have been taught.

4. Jesus Didn’t Return in the Flesh

Christian tradition has long held that Jesus Christ died on the cross and resurrected with his physical body from the tomb. This belief is based on the biblical accounts where Jesus’ tomb is found empty, and he later appears to his disciples. While this is the mainstream view, it is not the whole picture. There are deeper layers and esoteric truths that have been suppressed, overlooked, or deliberately erased from official doctrine.

Though the physical body of Jesus was crucified, the truth is far more profound: His soul did not perish. It transmigrated—passed into another form. This ancient concept of transmigration of the soul, or reincarnation, was once understood among early peoples but has since been erased from most Christian doctrine. Yet, we find hints of it preserved in scripture. When Jesus asked his disciples, “Who do people say the son of man is?” (Matthew 16:13), they replied: “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets” (Matthew 16:14). This statement reveals that people of that time believed Jesus could be a reincarnation of previous prophets. Sadly, in today's world, such deeper, esoteric truths are rarely explored or taught, and this is precisely why it is essential to question inherited narratives and seek truth with an awakened, independent mind.

Before his arrest, Jesus prayed, “O My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me” (Matthew 26:39). Jesus, whose prayers had always been answered, asked to be spared from crucifixion. Are we to assume that God suddenly denied him? On the contrary, God honored his plea. The Bible recounts that Simon of Cyrene was made to carry Jesus’ cross (Mark 15:21). The same character appears in other Gnostic gospels, further substantiating the broader picture that, in fact, the soul of Jesus switched with the soul of Simon.

The following is an excerpt from an ancient manuscript that was recently discovered and rejected by the church, which is led by fallible men. In Jesus’ words:

“I did not succumb to them as they had planned. But I was not afflicted at all…And I did not die in reality but in appearance…For my death, which they think happened, (happened) to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death…But in doing these things, they condemn themselves…They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. I[t] was another upon whom they placed the crown of thorns’’ (The Second Treatise of the Great Seth, The Nag Hammadi Collection).

In this account, Jesus confirms the argument that it wasn't he who was actually crucified, just as the Quran states:

“They did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, but it appeared to them as if they did” (Quran 4:157).

In fact, Jesus’ soul switched with the soul of the angel Metatron, who took Simon of Cyrene as its avatar. That same angel came to comfort Jesus before his crucifixion:

“Then an angel from heaven appeared to him and strengthened him.” (Luke 22:43)

Further evidence appears in another Gnostic gospel, where Saint Irenaeus quotes Basilides:

“He himself did not suffer. Rather, a certain Simon of Cyrene was compelled to carry his cross for him. It was he who was ignorantly and erroneously crucified, being transfigured by him, so that he might be thought to be Jesus. Moreover, Jesus assumed the form of Simon, and stood by laughing at them” (Adversus haereses (Against Heresies), Saint Irenaeus, p. 82).

We have yet another manuscript that confirms our claim:

“He whom you saw on the tree, glad and laughing, this is the living Jesus. But this one into whose hands and feet they drive the nails is his fleshly part, which is the substitute being put to shame” (The Apocalypse of Peter, The Nag Hammadi Collection).

If you are still not convinced, we have more proof. The Bible records that Jesus appeared to his disciples, and on each occasion, they could not recognise him. That is because he kept switching avatars.

“And I was laughing at their ignorance. And I subjected all their powers… For I was altering my shapes, changing from form to form.” (The Second Treatise of the Great Seth, The Nag Hammadi Collection)

The first recorded appearance of Jesus after the crucifixion is found in the Gospel of John, where Mary Magdalene encounters him as a gardener. She does not recognize him at first and even asks where the body of Jesus has been taken. It is only when he speaks to her that she realizes who he is—not by his appearance, but by his speech.

Many Christians argue that Jesus was so disfigured from the crucifixion that he was unrecognizable. But this explanation falls short, because Mary had followed him closely for years and heard his voice many times. Surely she would recognize his face—even bruised and bloodied—especially if she witnessed his crucifixion. If she had truly seen him in such a wounded state, her reaction would likely have been one of shock, grief, or concern. Yet the Gospel describes none of this.

Granted, if this had happened only once—if Jesus had been unrecognizable on a single occasion—we might dismiss it as a rare moment of confusion or a misunderstanding. But this is not the case. The pattern repeats itself. Time after time, those closest to him fail to recognize Jesus by appearance, only realizing who he is through his mannerisms, words, or actions. This is no coincidence at all. In fact, he was switching avatars, hence why he was unrecognisable.

In the book of John, the disciples kept trying to catch fish but to no avail, until a man came and told them to throw their net on the right side of the boat, and at last they caught so many fish that they could not haul the net in. They “did not realize that it was Jesus” (John 21:4), up until that miraculous point. Yet another account is recorded in the book of Luke, where Jesus appears on the road to Emmaus as a stranger, and the disciples could not recognise him.

These mainstream theological assumptions are the conclusions of fallible men—men who lacked the full picture and sought to fill the gaps with speculation, trying to make sense of that which doesn't make sense, so to say. In fact, only the one who is guided by the Holy Spirit can perceive the truth behind these mysteries, which is why we have Aba Al-Sadiq to fill these gaps for us and piece together the full picture.

5. Jesus Wasn’t the Last Messenger — The Prophetic Chain Never Broke

Many Protestant Christians hold the belief that Jesus Christ was the final messenger sent to mankind. Yet, this view stands in contradiction to their own scripture, where it explicitly states in many places of the Bible that there will come “prophets, wise men and sages” (Matthew 23:34) after Jesus. This verse alone challenges the finality claim, for it directly implies that others will follow after Jesus—those divinely sent to teach and guide.

When we examine the biblical narrative more closely, a consistent pattern emerges: God never leaves the earth without a representative—a prophet, a shepherd, a vessel through whom His Spirit operates. We see it repeatedly. Moses appointed Joshua. David appointed Solomon. Elijah appointed Elisha. Even the animal kingdom bears witness to this truth—bees have a queen, ants have a leader, wolves follow the alpha. Would the Creator of all living beings design structure and leadership in nature, yet neglect to appoint a guide for humanity, His most conscious creation? That would not only be a theological inconsistency—it would be a cosmic injustice. If God failed to appoint a successor, then the blame for humanity’s deviation would rest with Him. But such a thing is impossible, for God is just and wise. It is not God who abandons mankind—it is mankind who abandons God's appointed ones.

However, we must keep in mind that Jesus Christ also warned us of “false prophets” (Matthew 7:15) who will come to ‘deceive’ many after him. This implies that prophets—both true and false—will come. So the question becomes: How do we discern the true from the false? 

According to prophetic tradition, a true messenger must meet three essential conditions:

1. Foretold or Publicly Appointed

Every legitimate prophet is either foretold in scripture or publicly anointed by the prophet before him. Jesus himself fulfilled this. He was publicly baptized by John the Baptist (Matthew 3:13–17) and announced his mission in the synagogue using the scroll of Isaiah (Luke 4:21) as proof: “Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.” Contrast this with Paul, who lacked any prophetic foretelling or public anointing. He came solely based on a private vision that no one else could confirm—a stark departure from the prophetic tradition.

2. Possession of Divine Knowledge

The second condition is that he must have divine knowledge, and certainly Jesus was a very knowledgeable man who left the Pharisees speechless every time they tried to trip him up and make him falter. A true prophet illuminates, while false ones confuse and contradict. Paul’s teachings, by contrast, often clash with both Jesus’ message and the Torah.

3. Calls towards the Supremacy of God

A true prophet calls people to the sovereignty of God, never to the authority of empires. Jesus challenged the corrupt religious elite, flipped the tables of the hypocrite religious leaders and called people towards God’s laws, not the laws of the state. Paul, however, was very friendly with the governing authorities and instructed believers to obey the Roman Empire, the very same empire that crucified Jesus: “Whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted” (Romans 13:2). This is not the voice of a prophet but of someone who upheld Caesar’s throne rather than God's.

As we’ve seen, there is a clear and logical way to distinguish a true prophet from a false one. The claim that Jesus is the final man sent from God is not true. Jesus himself affirmed:

“While I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” (John 9:5)

His words reveal that his role as a bearer of divine light was temporal—he was a vessel chosen for a time, through whom the Spirit of God moved on earth. And just as the prophets before him appointed successors, Jesus too followed this divine pattern. He publicly appointed Simon Peter:

“You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church… I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven” (Matthew 16:18–19).

Furthermore, Jesus spoke repeatedly of a coming Comforter, Paraclete, or Helper—a figure who would guide and teach humanity. Many Christians interpret this as the Holy Spirit dwelling in all believers - but such a reading does not withstand scrutiny. If the Spirit were truly present across all Christians, the Church would not be fractured into thousands of sects, doctrines, and interpretations. For the fruit of the Spirit is unity, not division. The very existence of such doctrinal chaos undermines the claim that this Comforter is a general spirit present within all.

In fact, historical evidence suggests that the original reference to this Comforter was far more specific. The term “Paraclete” or “Comforter” was originally “Ahmad,” a name later replaced during the Council of Nicaea, where ecclesiastical authorities determined which texts would form the canonical Bible and which would be excluded. This deliberate alteration obscured a prophecy that pointed to a particular figure yet to come.

Remarkably, this name, Ahmad, has not been completely lost. It still appears within the Hebrew Bible. In Isaiah 42:1, we read: “Here is my servant, whom I uphold, my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him, and he will bring justice to the nations.” The phrase “whom I uphold” in the original Hebrew Bible is rendered as אחמד (Etmokh), which directly corresponds to Ahmad in the English transliteration. This linguistic and prophetic link is profound.

The fulfillment of this prophecy came approximately 500 years after Jesus, as confirmed by the Qur’an:

“And remember when Jesus, son of Mary, said, ‘O Children of Israel! I am truly Allah’s messenger to you, confirming the Torah which came before me and bringing good news of a messenger to come after me, whose name will be Ahmad.’ But when he came to them with clear proofs, they said, ‘This is obvious magic.’” (Qur’an 61:6)

Prophet Muhammad came in the same pattern as those before him—bearing divine proofs, upholding past revelations, and calling people back to monotheism. Yet history repeats itself, and like every other prophet, he was met with rejection, slander, and hostility. The rejection of Muhammad by many Christians mirrors the earlier rejection of Jesus by the Jewish authorities—both denials rooted in the failure to perceive the continuity of divine guidance. And now ironically, the muslims reject the Qaim.

Before his passing, the Prophet Muhammad left behind a will, an explicit divine document naming his successors. This will listed the twelve Imams and the twelve Mahdis to come after him. Among them is Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq, the second Mahdi, and who is the one known as the Qaim, the Riser of Truth.

Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq is the only figure in over 1,400 years to publicly claim his position as the very Abdullah mentioned in the Prophet’s will, and he matches the description of the Qaim perfectly. Furthermore, he also fulfills the three essential criteria of a legitimate messenger:

1. Clear Proof of Appointment – The written will of Prophet Muhammad.

2. Divine Knowledge – To this day, no critic has successfully refuted his message or provided superior evidence against him.

3. Call to Divine Supremacy – Uniquely among today’s voices, his is the only one calling people towards the supremacy of God, and he is the only one with the mission of establishing God’s law.

In conclusion, the claim of finality for Jesus Christ is not only theologically inconsistent but also scripturally unfounded. The divine tradition has always been one of succession.. From Adam to Noah, from Moses to Jesus, and from Jesus to Muhammad, God has never left His creation without a vicegerent. And in our time, that is none other than Abdullah Hashem Aba Al-Sadiq—the Qaim, the Riser—whose emergence was foretold, whose knowledge is unmatched, and whose mission revives the call to divine sovereignty. His appearance is not a break from the legacy of the prophets, but its natural and inevitable continuation.