Faith, Banned: How Malaysia Decides Which Beliefs Are Allowed

An official statement issued by the Chairman of the Johor State Islamic Affairs Committee, Mohd Fared Mohd Khalid, has renewed debate over the limits of religious freedom and intellectual discourse in Malaysia.

Under Malaysian law and administrative practice, individuals born into Muslim families are automatically registered as Muslims. They are required to adhere exclusively to the Ahlul Sunnah wal Jama'ah school of thought and are not legally permitted to study, question, or critically examine alternative Islamic interpretations or religious beliefs.

Critics argue that this framework stands in tension with the Qur’an, which affirms that there is no compulsion in religion and emphasizes the obligation to investigate, study, and freely choose the truth.

The controversy has intensified following the declaration of The Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light as deviant through a fatwa and its subsequent ban. Observers have questioned whether this designation implies that other religions—such as Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Sikhism—would also be considered deviant from the perspective of Malaysia’s religious authorities. These faiths, however, continue to be practiced openly in the country and have not been formally declared deviant by state institutions.

This disparity has prompted accusations of double standards and selective enforcement in Malaysia’s religious governance. Supporters of the Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light maintain that the movement’s emphasis on humanity, peace, and universal justice has drawn scrutiny precisely because of its theological claims and its challenge to established religious authority.

The issue underscores broader tensions in Malaysia between constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and the regulatory role of Islamic institutions in defining orthodoxy and belief. As reactions continue to emerge, the broader implications for religious freedom in Malaysia remain unresolved.